What is the ruling when a person admits a debt of one hundred dirhams, presents the money, and claims it was a deposit (wadi'ah), but the claimant states the presented money is the deposit and there is an additional debt?

Primary text

The ruling dictates that the statement of the claimant (the one to whom the acknowledgement was made) is accepted. This aligns with the position of Al-Khiraqi and Abu Hanifa. The claimant affirms that the money presented is the deposit, while asserting that the acknowledged debt remains separate and due from the confessor.