Does the mere presence of a crowd dispersing from a location where a body is found constitute Lawth?

Primary text

The second narration attributed to Ahmad states that Lawth is whatever makes the claimant's assertion likely to be true, which includes a group dispersing from a location where a body is found, establishing Lawth against each member of that group. If the guardian claims against one person and he denies being with the group, his word is accepted with his oath, according to Al-Qadi and the Shafi'i school, based on the presumption of absence unless proven otherwise. Conversely, if people crowd together in a narrow space and a body is found among them, Ahmad stated this is not Lawth; rather, the blood money (diyah) is taken from the public treasury (Bayt al-Mal), as narrated from 'Umar. This view is also held by Ishaq, Al-Hasan, and Al-Zuhri in cases of death by crushing, though Al-Hasan and Al-Zuhri held that the diyah is due from those present as the killing resulted from their actions.