What is the ruling when both claims of purchase are dated identically, or are general without dates, or one is dated and the other general?
General Chapter
Al-Mughni
Book of Claims and Evidences
Primary text
If the dates are the same, or non-specific, or one is dated and the other general, the proofs contradict each other because reconciliation is impossible. The ruling then depends on who possesses the item. If in the possession of one claimant, the ruling follows the dispute over the proof of the possessor versus the non-possessor (the insider versus the outsider). If in the seller's possession, the ruling is examined based on whether the proofs are nullified or considered valid.
Supporting text
If the proofs are nullified, the ruling reverts to the seller's position (oath or admission). If the proofs are not nullified, the seller's statement is disregarded, and a lot drawing determines the owner with an oath, or the item is divided equally, with each claimant receiving half the item corresponding to half the price paid, establishing them as partners. If the item is divisible, and the claimants are partners, they have the option to retain or rescind the sale regarding their share of the price.