What is the ruling when the condition for the three divorces contradicts the timing of the direct divorce?

Primary text

When the utterance specifies that the conditional divorce (three times) occurs before the actualization of the condition (the first divorce), the direct divorce takes effect, while the subsequent conditional pronouncements are nullified. This is because the conditional aspect is a description attached to the divorce which is impossible to fulfill as described—since the condition must precede the consequence, and stipulating the consequence before the condition is impossible. Therefore, the impossible description is voided, and the initial divorce, being a valid statement from a competent person regarding a valid marriage, must take effect. This is analogous to stating: 'If I divorce you, you are divorced three times, but these three are not binding'—the binding clause is voided, and the divorce stands.