Is speech comprising neutral commands like 'Eat' or 'Drink' considered a standard usage not associated with adverse meaning?

Primary text

The words commanding neutral acts such as 'Eat' and 'Drink' are not considered implicit terms for divorce because they are exclusively used in contexts where no harm is implied. This is supported by the usage in the Noble Quran, such as in Quran 52:19 ('Eat and drink in satisfaction for what you used to do') and Quran 4:4, ('So eat of it in ease and enjoyment'). Therefore, these utterances are not equivalent to 'Taste' or 'Sip painfully,' which are exclusively associated with distress and hardship.