What is the legal implication if ownership of the endowment property is ruled to have remained with the founder?

Primary text

If the founder's ownership is upheld, they are obligated to maintain the property and litigate regarding it. Furthermore, there is a possibility that the founder would be liable for the compensation (*arsh*) for any harm (*jinayah*) caused by the property, similar to how the master redeems the *umm walad* when delivery is impossible, which differs from the case of a non-owner.