Is the three-day fasting for expiation conditional upon being consecutive?

General Chapter

Al-Mughni

Book of Expiations

Book 60 · Issue 6 · Bab 1

Open in Qurani

Primary text

When one cannot afford feeding ten poor persons, clothing them, or freeing a slave for expiation, the obligation shifts to fasting three days, according to the verse: 'But whoever cannot find [the means for] it, then a fast of three days' [Quran 5:89]. The apparent position of the Madhhab is that the fast must be consecutive, a view held by Ibrahim Al-Nakha'i, Al-Thawri, Ishaq, Abu 'Ubayd, Abu Thawr, and the Ahl al-Ra'y, with similar reports from 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him). The evidence supporting consecution is the reading by Ubayy and 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud which mentions 'three consecutive days' (thlathata ayyamin mutataabi'atin), which, whether considered Quran or interpreted by the Prophet (peace be upon him), serves as binding evidence.

Supporting text

A secondary opinion, narrated by Ibn Abi Musa from Ahmad, and held by Malik and Al-Shafi'i (in one of his two opinions), permits separating the fasts because the command to fast is absolute and should not be restricted without proof. They analogize it to the three days of fasting for the Mutamatti' pilgrim during Hajj, for whom consecution is not obligatory.