Is cutting obligatory if property left on an animal or in still water is removed without the thief's subsequent action?

Primary text

There are two views regarding cases where property is left on an animal that leaves on its own without being driven, or if property left in still water escapes when the water flows, or if property attached to a garment is blown away by the wind while hanging in the air. One opinion states that cutting is obligatory because the thief's action was the cause (sabab) of its removal, similar to driving the animal or opening the water source.