Is the legal standard for witnessing adultery the same when witnesses testify to the act occurring in two different, close corners of the same house as it is for a single location?

Primary text

If two corners of a house where adultery occurred are close to each other, the testimony of the four witnesses (two for each corner) is considered complete, and the Hadd is established. This is because it is possible that the act began in one corner and concluded in the other, or that the witnesses attributed the location based on proximity to them. This is treated as if all witnesses agreed upon a single location, even though the physical location is technically split.