Does a minor, a woman, or a disbeliever participating in *Ghazu* (expedition) receive a full share (*Sihm*)?

Primary text

When a minor, a woman, or a disbeliever participates in a military expedition (*Ghazu*) and the ruling is that they only deserve *Radkh* (a token share or consolation gift), the horse accompanying them does not receive a full share. This is the apparent position among our colleagues (*Ashabuna*) because they hold that the *Radkh* allotted to the rider does not equal the full share designated for a mounted fighter (*Farisa*). This implies that the rider and their horse both receive an amount less than the full share. Furthermore, since the horse's share belongs to the rider, if the rider does not qualify for the full share by their presence, the horse certainly does not qualify.