Is it permissible to hire a cupper (Hajjam) for cupping services?

General Chapter

Al-Mughni

Book of Leasing

Book 25 · Issue 1 · Bab 1

Open in Qurani

Primary text

Hiring a cupper is permissible, and the wages received by the cupper are lawful. This view is chosen by Abu al-Khattab, and it is the position of Ibn Abbas, 'Ikrimah, Al-Qasim, Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Ali ibn al-Husayn, Rabi'ah, Yahya al-Ansari, Malik, Al-Shafi'i, and the Ashab al-Ra'y (followers of the view of Abu Hanifa). The primary evidence is the action of the Prophet (peace be upon him) who was cupped and gave the cupper his reward. If the Prophet knew it was forbidden, he would not have given it. Furthermore, cupping involves a permissible benefit, and the one performing it is not required to be from among those who perform acts of worship (Qurbah). Therefore, hiring for it is permissible, similar to building or tailoring. It is also permissible because there is a need for this service among people, and not everyone will perform it voluntarily, analogous to wet-nursing.

Supporting text

The ruling that the wage is permissible is further supported by interpreting the command given by the Prophet (peace be upon him) to the cupper to feed his dependents with the earnings as evidence of permissibility, as it is impermissible to feed one's dependents (slaves) unlawful sustenance. The Prophet's description of the earnings as 'khabith' (unwholesome/impure) does not necessitate prohibition, as the Prophet (peace be upon him) described garlic and onions as 'khabith' while permitting them.