Is a person who takes an animal whose capture is generally forbidden (as 'lost property') liable for its value?

Primary text

Any person, whether an Imam or otherwise, who takes an animal that is not permissible to take as found property is liable for its value. This liability arises because the taker has seized the property of another without permission, and without authorization from the Lawgiver, thus rendering the taker equivalent to a usurper (ghasib). The obligation of guarantee does not cease merely by returning the animal to the place where it was found; this is the position held by Al-Shafi'i. The primary evidence supporting the view that the guarantee only ends upon returning the item to its owner or the owner's representative is analogous to stolen or usurped property.