Is a bequest valid if it concerns the very person ('neck' or status) of the indentured servant when the servitude contract is invalid?

Primary text

The bequest concerning the status or person ('raqabah') of the indentured servant is valid even if the contract is invalid. This is based on the precedent that such a bequest is valid in a sound servitude contract, making it more appropriate (or certainly valid) in the case of an invalid one.