What is the ruling regarding stipulating the location where a male slave pledged (*Abd*) is kept?

Primary text

If the pledged item is a male slave, stipulating his location is valid. It is also valid even if no location is stipulated, similar to the female slave. The stronger opinion holds that they are equivalent, as the female slave is deemed equivalent to the male slave in this regard when the pledgee is a permissible custodian. If the pledgee of the male slave is an unmarried woman and the condition leads to forbidden seclusion with her, the condition is void.