What is the ruling on combining multiple instances of forgetfulness (suhū) of the same type within a single prayer?

Primary text

If a person commits two or more instances of forgetfulness of the same genus (type) during prayer, two prostrations (sujūd) suffice for all of them. This view is held universally, with no known opposition. If the forgetfulness involves two different types of errors, the ruling is the same. This position is narrated from Ahmad, and it is the view of the majority of scholars, including Al-Nakha'i, Al-Thawri, Malik, Al-Layth, Al-Shafi'i, and the People of Opinion (Ahl al-Ra'y). The legal rationale is that the prostrations are intended to rectify the deficiency of the prayer (jabr). Since a single set of prostrations suffices for multiple errors of the same type, it likewise suffices when the errors are of different types when combined. Furthermore, the Prophet (peace be upon him) once performed one set of prostrations for two separate errors (one before and one after the salam), establishing the principle that a single prostration set covers multiple instances. The narration stating 'For every instance of forgetfulness, there are two prostrations' (Rahu Abu Dawud and Ibn Majah) is interpreted to mean for every prayer in which forgetfulness occurs, two prostrations suffice, as forgetfulness is a generic term covering all instances within that single prayer.