Is the buyer's disposition of property via endowment (Waqf), gift (Hiba), or mortgage voidable by the pre-emptive claimant (Shufi)?

General Chapter

Al-Mughni

Book of Preemption (Shuf'ah)

Book 23 · Issue 1 · Bab 1

Open in Qurani

Primary text

The pre-emptive claimant possesses the right to annul a subsequent disposition such as an endowment, gift, or mortgage made by the purchaser, provided that the disposition itself does not necessitate the right of pre-emption. The claimant takes the property for the price established in the original sale. This is the position held by Abu Bakr, Malik, Al-Shafi'i, and the Ashab al-Ra'y (Hanafi scholars). Their evidence rests on the principle that if the claimant can annul subsequent sales, they certainly possess the right to annul a contract, such as an endowment or gift, against which pre-emption cannot be enacted. Furthermore, the right of the claimant precedes the purchaser's right, and the claimant's claim is stronger, thus the purchaser cannot engage in an action that invalidates the claimant's right. Annulment of an endowment is permissible for the sake of another's right, similar to a sick person endowing property while owing debt; upon death, the endowment is returned to creditors and heirs beyond the one-third limit, and annulment of emancipation is permissible, making annulment of endowment more fitting.

Supporting text

A view, narrated from Ahmad through Ali ibn Sa'id and Bakr ibn Muhammad, as well as attributed to Al-Masarjasi regarding endowments, states that the right of pre-emption is nullified when the disposition involves an endowment or a gift. This is because pre-emption is established only over owned property, and these acts remove the property from ownership. Ibn Abi Musa also stated that if a purchased house is turned into a mosque, it is consumed, and there is no pre-emption, arguing that upholding pre-emption in such cases causes harm to the donee or the end recipient, as their ownership is removed without compensation. This differs from a sale, where annulling the second sale allows the second buyer to recover their purchase price, thus avoiding harm.