How should the alternation of shooting be managed between two participants?

Primary text

If one person begins the shooting in one direction, the other must begin in the second direction to maintain fairness between them. If they agree that one person shall begin for all sequences, the condition is invalid because the foundation of archery practice is equality, and pre-stipulating a perpetual advantage constitutes disparity. However, if this occurs without stipulation but by mutual consent, it is permissible because the initial start has no bearing on hitting the target or the quality of the shot. Stipulating that each person begins in two consecutive sequences is permissible due to their equality. An alternative view suggests that stipulating who begins in any mentioned instance is not obligatory and does not affect the contract, as it has no impact on the quality of the shot or the frequency of hitting the mark, and many archers prefer shooting second.