Is the declaration of a slave regarding offenses punishable by Hadd (prescribed penalty) other than theft, or Qisas for injuries less than homicide, accepted?

Primary text

The declaration of a slave concerning offenses punishable by a prescribed penalty (Hadd), excluding theft, or concerning Qisas for injuries less than homicide, is accepted. This is the view of Abu Hanifa, Malik, and Al-Shafi'i. The evidence supporting this is the report that Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) cut off the hand of a slave based on his declaration of theft, and flogged a slave who confessed to Zina (fornication) to half the prescribed Hadd. There is no recorded opposition from the Companions, indicating consensus (Ijma). Furthermore, what the master's declaration is not accepted regarding the slave, the slave's declaration is accepted, as with divorce. Since the slave is less suspected in these matters because the harm is more specific to him and he feels the pain most directly, his declaration is accepted, similar to a wife's confession.