What is the ruling on extending the concession of 'Urayah by analogy (Qiyas) to other fruits?

Primary text

Extending the 'Urayah concession to other fruits by analogy is invalid. This is the primary reasoning against extending the ruling, as analogy is disregarded when it contradicts a clear textual prohibition (Nass). The analogy proposed by opponents contradicts specific texts that prohibit similar transactions (like grapes for raisins) without exception. Therefore, analogy should not be applied to generalize the ruling beyond the specifically exempted case (date palms).