Who owns the game caught using usurped hunting equipment (bow, arrow, net)?

Primary text

There are two views regarding game caught using usurped equipment like a bow, arrow, or net. One view maintains that the game belongs to the equipment's owner because it was acquired through that equipment, thus resembling the increase of their property or the earnings of their slave. The second view asserts the game belongs to the usurper because the hunting resulted from his own action, and the equipment is merely an instrument.