What is the ruling if a person usurps a garment from one owner and dye from another, and dyes the garment?

Primary text

If the values of the garment and dye remain unchanged, the owners of the garment and dye become partners in the dyed garment according to the proportion of their respective property values. If the value increases, the surplus belongs to both owners proportionally. If the value decreases due to the dyeing process, the liability for the loss falls upon the usurper, and the dye owner suffers the loss, which he can reclaim from the usurper because the dye was dissipated into the garment. If the decrease is due to a drop in the market price of the garment, the dye, or both, the usurper is not liable, and the loss for each party is borne by that party's owner.