Is a father subject to Qisas for killing his own son?

General Chapter

Al-Mughni

Book of Wounds

Book 47 · Issue 3 · Bab 1

Open in Qurani

Primary text

A father is not subject to retribution for killing his son, irrespective of the son's lineage (whether through sons or daughters). This view is attributed to Umar ibn al-Khattab, Rabi'ah, al-Thawri, al-Awza'i, al-Shafi'i, Ishaq, and the Ahl al-Ra'y (Companions of Abu Hanifa). The evidence supporting this is the saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him): 'A father shall not be killed for his son,' narrated by Umar and Ibn Abbas. This narration is considered well-known and established among the scholars of Hejaz and Iraq, sufficient to negate the necessity of a full chain of narration. Another supporting evidence is the Prophet's statement to Hasan, 'You and your son belong to your father,' implying a kind of ownership that raises a doubt (Shubha) which serves to ward off Qisas, as the right to retribution is repelled by doubts. Additionally, the father is the source of the son's existence, and thus should not be subjected to execution due to that very relationship.

Supporting text

The opposing view holds that the father is subject to Qisas based on the general texts of the Book and Sunnah mandating retribution for murder. They argue that both father and son are free, Muslim individuals eligible for Qisas against others, so they should execute each other like strangers. Malik differentiates, stating if the killing was by hacking with a sword, Qisas is not applicable, but if it was by slaughtering or a killing method clearly intended for execution rather than discipline, Qisas is incumbent.