What is the ruling regarding retribution when a person consumes something unlawful that removes their intellect, other than alcohol?

Primary text

If a person consumes something unlawful that causes the complete loss of intellect, making him like an insane person, then retribution is not obligatory. However, if the loss of intellect is temporary and returns without intervention, it is treated the same as voluntary intoxication, based on the established details concerning intoxication.