Is Zakat due on stolen livestock when the owner considers them grazing animals, but the usurper considers them fed?

Primary text

If the livestock were grazing animals for the owner but considered fed by the usurper, no Zakat is due because the condition for Zakat is absent. The position stating Zakat is due because feeding is unlawful is rejected. The unlawful act is the usurpation itself; feeding the animal is an expenditure made by the usurper upon his own possession, and it contains no prohibition. The notion that slight expenditure (Khaffat al-mu'unah) is considered is incorrect, as lightness is only considered in relation to its presumed context, which is the grazing status itself.