ﲛ ﲜ ﲝ ﲞ ﲟ ﲠ ﲡ ﲢ ﲣ ﲤ ﲥ
But they who believe and do righteous deeds - those are the companions of Paradise; they will abide therein eternally.
ﲛ ﲜ ﲝ ﲞ ﲟ ﲠ ﲡ ﲢ ﲣ ﲤ ﲥ
But they who believe and do righteous deeds - those are the companions of Paradise; they will abide therein eternally.
Tafsir
Verse range: 2:82
Know that the Exalted and Sublime has not mentioned a verse of threat (wa'īd) in the Qur'an without mentioning alongside it a verse of promise (wa'd). This is for several benefits:
Herein lie several issues:
The argument is that if Iman (faith) implied righteous action, then mentioning "and did righteous deeds" (وعملوا الصالحات) after "those who believed" (والذين آمنوا) would be redundant repetition.
The Qadi (Judge) responded that although Iman encompasses all righteous deeds, the statement "they believed" (آمنوا) only indicates that they performed one act of faith. Therefore, it is appropriate to say, "And those who believed and did righteous deeds."
The Rebuttal: The past tense verb (آمنوا) indicates the occurrence of the verbal noun (the masdar, i.e., the state of belief) in a past time. Iman is the verbal noun. If this single statement implied all righteous deeds, then the word "believed" would be evidence for the issuance of all those deeds from them. And Allah knows best.
We are discussing one who performed faith and righteous deeds, then committed a major sin (كبيرة) without repenting. This person, before committing the major sin, was correctly described as one who "believed and did righteous deeds" at that time. If this description applied to him then, it must still apply to him now. If it applies to him, he must be included under the saying: {Those are the companions of Paradise, they will abide therein eternally}.
Objection: The statement {and did righteous deeds} (وعملوا الصالحات) does not apply to him unless he performs all righteous deeds. Repentance is among the righteous deeds. If he does not repent, he has not performed righteous deeds, and thus is not included under the verse.
Response: We have already established that before committing the major sin, the description "believed and did righteous deeds" applied to him at that time. If that description applied to him then, it means the composite description applied to him. When the composite description is true, the singular components must also be true. Furthermore, if he commits the major sin, it is not true that he "believed and did righteous deeds" at all times. However, our statement "believed and did righteous deeds" is more general than saying "he was so at all times or at some times." What is considered in the verse is the common denominator (the shared essence). Thus, it is established that he falls under the ruling of the promise.
What remains is their assertion that the wicked person's sin nullifies the reward of his obedience, thus tipping the scale toward the threat. However, the discussion regarding this point has already preceded.
Al-Jubba'i used this verse as proof that whoever enters Paradise does not enter it by grace (favor/bounty, tafaddul). This is because the statement {Those are the companions of Paradise} (أولئك أصحاب الجنة) implies restriction (exclusivity, hasr). It indicates that Paradise has no companions other than these who believed and did righteous deeds.
Response: Why should it not be that the meaning is that they are the ones who deserve it, and whoever is given Paradise by grace does not fall under this specific ruling? And Allah knows best.