ﱽ ﱾ ﱿ ﲀ ﲁ ﲂ ﲃ ﲄ
That is the bounty from Allah, and sufficient is Allah as Knower.
ﱽ ﱾ ﱿ ﲀ ﲁ ﲂ ﲃ ﲄ
That is the bounty from Allah, and sufficient is Allah as Knower.
Tafsir
Verse range: 4:69-70
It is known that the Almighty commanded obedience to Allah and obedience to the Messenger (peace be upon him) in His saying: {O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger} [An-Nisa: 59]. Then, He discredited the path of those who sought judgment from the Taghut (idols/false authorities) and turned away from the Messenger. Subsequently, He reiterated the command to obey the Messenger, saying: {And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allah} [An-Nisa: 64]. Then, He encouraged this obedience by saying: {That would have been better for them and more firm in establishment. And if We had given them from Us a great reward, We would have guided them to a straight path} [An-Nisa: 66–68].
He reaffirmed the command to obey Allah and the Messenger in this verse once more, saying: {And whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger – then those will be with those upon whom Allah has bestowed favor, from the prophets and the truthful and the martyrs and the righteous, and how excellent are those as companions} [An-Nisa: 69].
Herein lie several issues:
Scholars have mentioned several accounts regarding the occasion of revelation (Sabab al-Nuzul):
The established scholars state that while we do not deny the authenticity of these narrations, the true reason for the revelation must be something greater: encouragement and motivation toward obedience. You know that a specific occasion does not negate the generality of the wording. This verse is general for all accountable persons: whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger has achieved high ranks and noble stations with Allah the Almighty.
The apparent meaning of {And whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger} suggests that one instance of obedience suffices. This is because a linguistic expression denoting a quality is satisfied by the mere existence of that attribute once.
Al-Qadi (the Judge) argued that this must be interpreted beyond its apparent meaning. Obedience must mean performing all commanded acts and abandoning all forbidden acts. If we accepted only one instance of obedience, the wicked and the disbelievers would be included, as they might perform a single act of obedience.
I have another perspective based on the principles of jurisprudence: A ruling mentioned immediately following a description implies that the ruling is caused by that description. If this is established, we say: {And whoever obeys Allah} means whoever obeys Allah in His capacity as God. Obedience to Allah as God is knowing Him, affirming His Majesty, Glory, Sovereignty, and Self-Sufficiency.
Thus, this verse serves as a reminder of two great matters concerning the Return (the Hereafter):
The phrase {whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger—then those will be with those upon whom Allah has bestowed favor...} does not mean they all share the exact same rank, as this would imply equality between the superior and the inferior, which is impermissible. Rather, it means they will be in Paradise in such a way that each one can see the others, regardless of the distance, because when the veils are removed, they can witness one another. If they desire to visit or meet, they will be able to do so. This is the meaning of this companionship (Ma'iyyah).
Allah mentioned the Prophets, then three subsequent descriptions: the Truthful (Siddiqin), the Martyrs (Shuhada), and the Righteous (Salihin). Scholars agree that the Prophets are distinct from the other three groups. However, they differed regarding these three descriptions:
We will now examine these three descriptions:
Al-Siddiq is the name given to one whose habit is truthfulness. If a person’s habit is performing an action, the fa'il pattern (like Siddiq) is used, similar to Sakkir (excessive drinker) or Sharrib (excessive drinker). Truthfulness is a noble and virtuous attribute of believers. Truthfulness is sufficient virtue because faith (Iman) is nothing but affirmation (Tasdiq), and falsehood is sufficient condemnation because disbelief (Kufr) is nothing but denial (Takdhib).
Exegetes have several views on the Siddiq:
Proof of his precedence in affirmation: It is famously narrated that the Prophet (PBUH) said: "I never presented Islam to anyone except that they had some hesitation, except for Abu Bakr, who did not falter." This Hadith indicates that when the Prophet presented Islam to Abu Bakr, he accepted immediately without delay. If we supposed his Islam was delayed after others, it would imply the Prophet was remiss in presenting it to him sooner, which is impossible (as that would imply a flaw in the Prophet, which is disbelief). Since attributing this shortcoming to the Prophet is nullified, we know the Prophet did not delay presenting Islam to him. Since the Hadith states Abu Bakr did not hesitate at all, the combination of these two points proves Abu Bakr was the first among people to embrace Islam.
Proof of his being a role model: Even if we suppose that Ali’s Islam preceded Abu Bakr’s, no rational person doubts that Ali was not a role model at that time because he was a young boy and was under the Prophet's direct care due to kinship. Abu Bakr did not have such close kinship. The faith of someone in this position would inspire others to embrace Islam. It is agreed that after Abu Bakr believed, shortly thereafter, he brought Uthman ibn Affan, Talha, Al-Zubayr, Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas, and Uthman ibn Maz'un (RA) to Islam. Thus, his faith became the basis for these great companions to emulate him. Therefore, it is established that Abu Bakr (RA) was the foremost in faith among people, and his faith led the noblest companions to follow him. Thus, the most deserving of this description in this Ummah is Abu Bakr (RA).
This implies he was the best of creation after the Prophet (PBUH), demonstrated in two ways:
The interpretation of Siddiq as described shows that after Prophethood, there is no rank in virtue or knowledge higher than this description—being a Siddiq. The wording of the Qur'an also supports this: wherever the Prophet and the Siddiq are mentioned together, no intermediary is placed between them. He described Ishmael as: {Indeed, he was true to his word} [Maryam: 54], and Idris as: {Indeed, he was a truthful one and a prophet} [Maryam: 56]. In this verse, He says: {from the prophets and the truthful}, meaning if you ascend from the rank of Siddiqiyyah, you reach Prophethood, and if you descend from Prophethood, you reach Siddiqiyyah; there is no middle ground. He also said: {And the one who brought the truth and believed in it} [Az-Zumar: 33], placing no intermediary. Just as these proofs negate an intermediary, Allah honored this Ummah, described as the best Ummah, by making Abu Bakr the Imam after the Messenger (PBUH) by consensus. When he passed away, they buried him next to the Messenger of Allah (PBUH), precisely because Allah removed the intermediary between the Prophets and the Siddiqin in this verse, and consequently, the intermediary between them was removed in the aspects we have enumerated.
The discussion regarding Martyrs has occurred elsewhere in this book, but it is beneficial to reiterate some points. Martyrdom cannot simply mean being killed by a disbeliever, for several reasons:
Rather, the Martyr (Shahid) is fa'il in the sense of the active agent: one who testifies to the truth of Allah's religion, sometimes through argument and proof, and sometimes by the sword and spear. Martyrs are those who uphold justice, as mentioned by Allah: {Allah testifies that there is no deity except Him, and [so do] the angels and those of knowledge, [He is] upholding justice} [Al 'Imran: 18]. The one killed in the path of Allah is called a Martyr because he offered his life in support of Allah's religion, testifying that it is the Truth and everything else is falsehood. Since he is a witness for Allah in this sense, he is a witness for Allah in the Hereafter, as stated: {And thus We have made you a balanced nation so that you will be witnesses over the people} [Al-Baqarah: 143].
The Righteous person is one who is sound in belief (I'tiqad) and sound in action (Amal). Ignorance is corruption in belief, and sin is corruption in action.
Once you understand the meaning of Siddiq and Shahid, the difference between these attributes becomes clear. Every person whose belief is correct and whose actions are obedience and free from sin is Salih. A Salih may also be one who testifies to the truth of Allah's religion, sometimes through proof and argument, and sometimes by the sword. A Salih might not possess this quality of testifying.
Therefore, every Martyr is Righteous, but not every Righteous person is a Martyr. The Martyr is the noblest type of the Righteous. Furthermore, a Martyr may or may not be a Siddiq. Since a Siddiq is one who preceded others in faith and whose faith became a model for others, every Siddiq is a Martyr, but not every Martyr is a Siddiq.
The hierarchy of virtue is thus:
In summary: The highest angels receive the true religion from Allah. Prophets receive it from the angels, as stated: {He sends down the angels with the Spirit of His command upon whom He wills of His servants} [An-Nahl: 2]. The Siddiqin receive it from the Prophets. The Martyrs receive it from the Siddiqin (since the Siddiq is the one who first received it from the Prophets and became a model for those after him). The Righteous receive it from the Martyrs. This establishes the order of these ranks. Once this is understood, it becomes clear that no one enters Paradise except by falling under one of these descriptions and attributes.
He then said: {And how excellent are those as companions} (Wa husna ula'ika rafīqā). This contains several issues:
The author of Al-Kashshaf stated that this phrase carries a sense of wonder, as if saying: "How excellent are those as companions!"
Linguistically, Rifq means gentleness of disposition and kindness in action; its practitioner is a Rafīq. A companion is called Rafīq because they benefit one another (yartafiqu bihi).
Al-Wahidi noted that Rafīq is singular even though it describes a plural group. The Arabs use the singular form for both singular and plural when referring to Rafīq, Rasul (messenger), and Barīd (courier). Allah says: {So say, "We are two messengers of your Lord"} [Ash-Shu'ara: 16] (using the dual form for messengers). However, one cannot say, "How excellent those men are (rajulan)." This usage is permissible only for a word that functions as an adjective (sifah). If it were a concrete noun like rajul (man) or imra'ah (woman), it would not be permissible. Al-Zajjaj permitted it even for nouns, claiming it was the view of Sibawayh. Another opinion is that {How excellent those are} means "How excellent each one of them is as a companion," similar to His saying: {Then He makes you come out as a child} [Ghafir: 67].
Rafīqā is in the accusative case, either as a Tamyīz (specification/elucidation) or as a Hāl (circumstantial adverb), meaning "How excellent each one of them is in the state of being a companion."
Allah specified that those who obey Allah and the Messenger will be with the Prophets, the Truthful, the Martyrs, and the Righteous. Furthermore, He stated that they will be their Rafīq (companion/confidant). We mentioned that a Rafīq is one from whom one derives benefit (yartafiqu bihi) in travel or residence. This indicates that these obedient ones will benefit from them. This benefit is only achieved if they receive kindness and goodness from them. We have repeatedly mentioned the manner of this benefit. On a literal level, a person can be with another without being their Rafīq. However, if one is extremely compassionate and attentive to the other's affairs, they become their Rafīq. Allah clarifies that the Prophets, the Truthful, the Martyrs, and the Righteous will be like Rifaq to them due to the intensity of their love and joy at seeing them.
He then said: {That is the bounty from Allah} (Dhalika al-fadlu min Allah). This contains several issues:
Undoubtedly, the word {That} (Dhalika) refers to everything mentioned previously regarding the description of the reward. By judging all of this to be a Fadl (bounty/grace) from Allah, it indicates that the reward is not obligatory upon Allah.
Rational proofs also support this:
Thus, the apparent meaning of the verse, supported by decisive rational proofs, indicates that all reward is a bounty from Allah.
The Mu'tazila, however, argue that even if the reward were obligatory, it would not be impossible to call it a Fadl. This is because the servant only deserved the reward because Allah tasked him (and this commissioning is a favor), and because Allah granted the intellect and capacity, and removed excuses and impediments so the accountable person could perform the obedience. This is like someone who gives another a garment to benefit from, and then that person sells it and benefits from the price; the price can still be described as a bounty from the giver. The same applies here.
There are two possibilities for {That is the bounty from Allah}:
The first interpretation is undoubtedly more eloquent.
{And Allah is sufficient as an All-Knower} (Wa kafa billahi 'Alima). This has a great significance in reinforcing the preceding encouragement toward obedience to Allah. By this, Allah indicates that He knows the manner of obedience and the manner of recompense and favor. This encourages the accountable person toward perfect obedience and guarding against any shortcoming therein.